Monday, 19 October 2009

Media blackout, Pharmaceutical payout and the vaccine illusion

From the moment I read that teenager Natalie Morton died only two hours after receiving the cancer vaccine alarms clanged. But her autopsy reached the news within days informing the public she died of an undiagnosed tumour. This seemed to be very convenient considering the governments have been trying hard to persuade the public that the swine flu vaccine is safe.

There appears to be a blackout in the mainstream media where any truth of the dangers of the vaccine is concerned and this led me to wonder if it’s possible to falsify death certificates.

In the book "Swine Flu Exposed" written by Eleanora I. McBean, Ph.D., N.D. we’re shown that in the past when a death has occurred as a direct result of a vaccine doctors, by their own admission, have indeed falsified death certificates omitting the word vaccine (Chapter 5: Falsified Death Certificates and Medical Records ) to “preserve vaccinations from reproach.” 

As this has happened in the past, then it seems feasible that the same falsification could happen again in this day and age especially when the vaccine is one which the government seems to have a desire to promote.

As already mentioned, there seems to be a blackout of the truth regarding swine flu and cancer vaccines in the mainstream media. British news is certainly driving the "vaccine is safe" line forward with full force and when someone of moral standing does speak out the article vanishes from the internet in a blink of an eye. Take for example:

Dr Harper, a leading expert who developed the cancer vaccine and also involved with the clinical trials of Cervarix said the jab was being “over-marketed” and parents should be properly warned about the potential side effects. She also claimed the jab would do nothing to reduce the rates of cervical cancer in the UK.

Authorities in the UK should be on the alert because its sister vaccine, Gardasil, used in America, has already been associated with 32 deaths, she said.

Her comments follow the death of 14-year-old Natalie Morton, who collapsed an hour after receiving the jab at school last week.

It is highly unusual for a researcher to  publicly criticise a vaccine which they helped get approved.

However, Dr Harper, who has written many of the published medical papers about the jab, is so concerned she decided to speak out.

Dr Harper, of the University of Missouri-Kansas, said she believed the risks – “small but real” – could be worse than the risk of developing cancer itself.

And she claimed: “All this jab will do is prevent girls getting some abnormalities associated with cervical cancer which can be treated. It will not decrease cervical cancer rates at all.

“Parents need to know this and that in a small number of cases there are serious side effects.”

Post mortem results last week blamed Natalie’s death on a rare cancer but Dr Richard Halvorsen, author of The Truth About Vaccines, said: “One minute Natalie is an apparently healthy girl, she has the vaccine and within two hours she is dead.

We are told she had a terrible cancer inside her that killed her but this is implausible.

“If you have cancer you have symptoms. Clearly public health doctors are desperate to turn the debate away from the vaccine as a possible cause.”


But, not surprisingly, the article vanished ....however it can still be read in Google’s Cache although I’m not sure for how long: Jab as deadly as the cancer

Dr Diane Harper has tried to speak out to warn parents but has been met by stonewalling. However,AHRP (Alliance for Human Research Protection) has printed her voice:

"She said that vaccinating little girls now is not going to protect them later. Since it can take a decade or more to even manifest itself as dysplasia, the HPVs against which this vaccine works may infect a little girl at the age she needs the vaccine most - meaning she will have to have a booster at the right point in time or she will not be protected. And, remember, it won't work at all if she was positive for the virus when she was inoculated in the first place.

Merck knows this, Harper said. "To mandate now is simply to Merck's benefit, and only to Merck's benefit," she said.

Dr. Harper said, she's been trying for months to convince major television and print media to listen to her and tell the facts about the usefulness and effectiveness of this vaccine.  "But no one will print it," she said.
Something is very wrong with this commercially driven frenzied marketing which all those who shape public policy and public opinion were caught shilling for Merck.
Independent advocates need to take to the streets to protect our children from irresponsible pharmaceutical companies whose financial largesse buys public officials, government agencies that are supposed to protect us from potentially harmful drugs and vaccines, and the uncritical transcribers of hype in the press!


I’m left wondering that maybe the blackout of truth in the UK will continue until the "time bomb" vaccinations for both the swine flu and cervical cancer finally explode, especially considering the safety net provided for pharmaceutical companies by the government in the form of a document of immunity from legal prosecution should anyone suffer from any side effects.

What a coup it would be for the pharmaceuticals not only to gain millions by the vaccinations but also  medicating the debilitating diseases some people may suffer from the vaccines for the foreseeable future.

And if that wasn’t bad enough, then knowing that Sir Roy Anderson, a scientist who advises the Government on swine flu is a paid director of a drugs firm making hundreds of millions of pounds from the pandemic, is the icing on the cake.

Daily Mail
"Professor Sir Roy Anderson sits on the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (Sage), a 20-strong task force drawing up the action plan for the virus.

Yet he also holds a £116,000-a-year post on the board of GlaxoSmithKline , the company selling swine flu vaccines and anti-virals to the NHS.


The Daily Mail also goes on to explain that because Sir Roy was at the centre of controversy (which he was forced to apologise and pay compensation), "a university inquiry in the wake of the scandal found he was in breach of rules by failing to disclose his business interests as director and shareholder of International Biomedical and Health Sciences Consortium - an Oxford-based biomedical consultancy, which had awarded grants to his research centre."

Sir Roy was forced to resign, although his career soon recovered. He moved to Imperial College within months, was made the Ministry of Defence's chief scientist and, last year, took over as Rector of Imperial College, London where he earns up to £400,000 a year.

He was one of the first UK experts to call the [swine flu] outbreak a pandemic."


Seems to me there are other agenda’s at work behind the vaccinations rather than the protection of the population from the so called swine flu “pandemic.”

The article by a German newspaper Bild reports the shock warning about the safety of the swine flu vaccine and that it contains cancerous cells from animals.

"Lung specialist Wolfgang Wodarg, a German health expert, said that there are many risks associated with the vaccine for the H1N1 virus.

He has grave reservations about the firm Novartis who are developing the vaccine and testing it in Germany. The vaccination is injected “with a very hot needle”, Wodarg said.

The nutrient solution for the vaccine consists of cancerous cells from animals and "we do not know if there could be an allergic reaction"

But more importantly, some people fear that the risk of cancer could be increased by injecting the cells.

The vaccine - as Johannes Löwer, president of the Paul Ehrlich Institute, has pointed out - can also cause worse side effects than the actual swine flu virus.

Wodrag also described people’s fear of the pandemic as an "orchestration": “It is great business for the pharmaceutical industry,” he told the ‘Neuen Presse’.

Swine flu is not very different from normal flu. “On the contrary if you look at the number of cases it is nothing compared to a normal flu outbreak,” he added.


It has to be said that the pharmaceutical companies are the ones to benefit from this so called “pandemic” because going by the risks involved with the vaccinations there certainly doesn't seem to be any benefits for  the population.

Unless the blackout in the mainstream media is lifted and the truth told, how many people will die or be affected with severe side effects by these vaccines? How many of our children will have the word "vaccination" omitted from their death certificates to “preserve vaccinations from reproach?" How many elderly and severely ill will be duped into believing they’re among the “at risk” group and must have the vaccine for their "own safety?" How many of us are going to fall foul to the possible hazardous ingredients because the government has signed a document of immunity from legal prosecution for the pharmaceutical companies who developed the vaccines?